Comments on: Chelsea 1-1 Barcelona (agg 1-1) – Champions League – Highlights

By: get laid bitches!!

get laid bitches!! — Wed, 13 May 2009 20:11:53 +0000

get laid and s*ck your 1 inch dick!! f**k you!!!!!!!!! btw no such thing as ball to hand -.-!!!!!!!!!11

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 May 2009 20:10:23 +0000

noobs!!! chelsea should have 1!!!!! f**k you bitches!! smd!!!

By: To anonymous

To anonymous — Sun, 10 May 2009 07:02:08 +0000

Did you really say that both hand ball apeals are BALL TO HAND? Even the one where Piquet touched it ? LOL!
That must be the dumbest thing i have ever heard. Piquet s hand was away from his body meaning he was intentionnally moving it… Meaning it s HAND to ball.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 09 May 2009 17:28:34 +0000

I watched the match again, and thought that Chelsea, as much as I hate them, were the better team in this game. However, over the two games Barca deserved to go to the final. I am convinced that only one penalty should have been awarded to Chelsea in the 2nd leg, when Drogba was fouled, they did not get it as he has a reputation for being a cheat, unfair on the night maybe, but what goes around……. As for the other claims, Malouda was fouled outside the area, then fell over like a big girl in the area, not a penalty. The two handballs shouts were both clearly ball to hand, so not penalties. The non awarding of a penalty for the foul on Drogba makes up for the clear penalty Barca should have got in the first leg. These things always even themselves out!!!!
Chelsea fans should stop being so bitter and grow up, get over it and realise that its not the end of the world! In saying that, I’m delighted Chelsea lost as the club represent everything that is wrong with the modern game!

By: Chelsea should have won

Chelsea should have won — Sat, 09 May 2009 15:26:00 +0000

YOU FREAKIN IDIOTS.
go watch the match la. only watch highlights and bitch so much.
chelsea sould have gotten two penalties out of the 4 claims.
and barca didnt make use of their possesion well enuf as chelsea even though they had more of it.
stupid BLIND SHIT REFREE couldnt see the penalties and gave abidal a red… D:
dont know which side he bias on.
overall chelsea shud have won
and idiots who never saw the whole match, go get it somehow and see how barca got ball magnets on their hands, especially when in the penalty box. dun matter if they played better

By: big mike

big mike — Fri, 08 May 2009 02:53:21 +0000

the time has come for video replay in football….for crying out loud…can FiFa and UeFa join the rest of the modern world…..where do they get these refs? reminds me of the fiasco those incompetent refs displayed during the 2002 world cup….

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 08 May 2009 02:06:06 +0000

Best meta-event

By: bill clinton

bill clinton — Thu, 07 May 2009 16:03:40 +0000

my bloody sat nav is broke..typed in chelsea today and it said” 2 mins from rome”

ho ho ho dikheads

By: VIVA Man U

VIVA Man U — Thu, 07 May 2009 14:10:49 +0000

I feel it was so ill-disciplined of Dropba (intended typo error) to approach the referee after the game like that. Looking back at the game, i remembered he had one chance one-on-one with the keeper then he blew it by making a pathetic shot..

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 07 May 2009 13:48:38 +0000

Oh and Barca, kick the crap out of United in the final please!!!