<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man Utd 2-2 Sunderland Highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eplmatches.com/2009/10/03/man-utd-vs-sunderland-highlights-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eplmatches.com/2009/10/03/man-utd-vs-sunderland-highlights-2/</link>
	<description>Watch English Premier League Highlights, Uefa Champions League Highlights, Euro 2008 Highlights and many more soccer videos and highlights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lister</title>
		<link>http://www.eplmatches.com/2009/10/03/man-utd-vs-sunderland-highlights-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6682</link>
		<dc:creator>Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eplmatches.com/?p=2325#comment-6682</guid>
		<description>Nobody&#039;s arguing about the time added on, you prick

It&#039;s about how you deserved to lose, and lose badly, yet still you don&#039;t have the dignity to admit when another team was far, far better.

Up yours, son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody&#8217;s arguing about the time added on, you prick</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about how you deserved to lose, and lose badly, yet still you don&#8217;t have the dignity to admit when another team was far, far better.</p>
<p>Up yours, son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leon o'trotsky</title>
		<link>http://www.eplmatches.com/2009/10/03/man-utd-vs-sunderland-highlights-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6650</link>
		<dc:creator>leon o'trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eplmatches.com/?p=2325#comment-6650</guid>
		<description>prick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adolf Lucifer</title>
		<link>http://www.eplmatches.com/2009/10/03/man-utd-vs-sunderland-highlights-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Adolf Lucifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eplmatches.com/?p=2325#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... two goals, several bookings, a sending off, five substitutions, endless time-wasting by Sunderland (understandably, in the circumstances); Richardson took an age to walk off, and Sunderland only made a move to make a substitution when he had left the field of play; then the Sunderland player took so long to walk off for the substitution that the ref had to hurry him up!
Clearly, there ought to have been more than 4 minutes added on - and then of course &lt;em&gt;another&lt;/em&gt; goal was scored in added time...
All in all, there is &lt;em&gt;no way&lt;/em&gt; there should have been fewer than 5 minutes added time... So where is the huge outcry?
Where are all the headlines screaming; &quot;&lt;em&gt;Brucie Time!&lt;/em&gt;&quot;?
And why - when a substitution is supposed to add 30 seconds - is added time always rounded up or down to a whole minute? This fact alone makes it evident that &quot;added time&quot; is in reality nothing more than a rough guess made at the discretion of the referee.
No, just as when Arsenal had 7 minutes injury time at OT last month, truth is duller than fiction when it comes to media coverage of football.
 
That of course is the beauty of the Interweb; it allows objective, observant and erudite observers such as yours truly to make plangent and percipient analyses and bring a little truth and beauty into the lives of the confused proletariat masses.
There&#039;s no need to thank me; I think of it as a public service...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; two goals, several bookings, a sending off, five substitutions, endless time-wasting by Sunderland (understandably, in the circumstances); Richardson took an age to walk off, and Sunderland only made a move to make a substitution when he had left the field of play; then the Sunderland player took so long to walk off for the substitution that the ref had to hurry him up!<br />
Clearly, there ought to have been more than 4 minutes added on &#8211; and then of course <em>another</em> goal was scored in added time&#8230;<br />
All in all, there is <em>no way</em> there should have been fewer than 5 minutes added time&#8230; So where is the huge outcry?<br />
Where are all the headlines screaming; &#8220;<em>Brucie Time!</em>&#8220;?<br />
And why &#8211; when a substitution is supposed to add 30 seconds &#8211; is added time always rounded up or down to a whole minute? This fact alone makes it evident that &#8220;added time&#8221; is in reality nothing more than a rough guess made at the discretion of the referee.<br />
No, just as when Arsenal had 7 minutes injury time at OT last month, truth is duller than fiction when it comes to media coverage of football.<br />
 <br />
That of course is the beauty of the Interweb; it allows objective, observant and erudite observers such as yours truly to make plangent and percipient analyses and bring a little truth and beauty into the lives of the confused proletariat masses.<br />
There&#8217;s no need to thank me; I think of it as a public service&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
